"Miranda v. Arizona." Wikipedia. 2005. Wiki Media. 9 May 2005 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona>.
Miranda Rights
Gold, Susan D. (1995). Miranda v. Arizona: Suspect's Rights. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
Miranda Decision
Thomas, George C. "The End of the Road for Miranda v. Arizona? On the History and Future of Rules for Police Interrogation." American Criminal Law Review 37.1 (2000): 1.
The Miranda Rule
Riley, Gail B. (1994). Miranda v. Arizona: Rights of the Accused. New York: Enslow Publishers.
Miranda Decision
Goldman, Jerry. "Miranda v. Arizona". Oyez. 2004. Oyez. 9 May 2005 <http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/251/>.
Miranda Rights
|
| |
Essay 411.com is a FREE academic essay service that provides users with useful
information about essay topics including CASE BACKGROUND BOTH SIDES MIRANDA VS ARIZONA essays. It was specifically designed so that
users could obtain this CASE BACKGROUND BOTH SIDES MIRANDA VS ARIZONA essays information easily and quickly and see it displayed all on one page.
You can find here CASE BACKGROUND BOTH SIDES MIRANDA VS ARIZONA essay definition, CASE BACKGROUND BOTH SIDES MIRANDA VS ARIZONA essays sources and also links to essays on CASE BACKGROUND BOTH SIDES MIRANDA VS ARIZONA.
Copyrights:
|
|
Ads by termpapers2000.com
Miranda V ArizonaA discussion of the 1966 Supreme Court decision. -- 2,025 words; 21 sources; www.termpapers2000.comMiranda v ArizonaA review of the case of Miranda v Arizona, and how Miranda was handled by the Arizona Police. -- 1,125 words; 4 sources; www.termpapers2000.comMiranda vs. ArizonaLooks at the meaning, implication, and implementation of the Miranda laws. -- 3,110 words; 9 sources; APA www.termpapers2000.comMiranda vs. Arizona and Dickerson vs. U.S.Argues that the Miranda warning is an important part of police procedure and that removal of the Miranda law would cause more harm than good. -- 1,838 words; 6 sources; MLA www.termpapers2000.comMiranda V. ArizonaDiscusses the 1966 Supreme Court decision on suspect's rights to counsel & silence. Examines background, significance, legal need for, provisions, exclusionary rule and effectiveness. -- 1,800 words; 7 sources; www.termpapers2000.com |
Ads by termpapers2000.com
|
|
|
|
|